Why 9/11 was easily preventable        -         By JMC
 

The politicos are now pointing fingers at each other, trying to shift the blame for the stupidity in
allowing a bunch of middle eastern yahoos to attack this country and murder nearly 3000 of our
citizens besides doing enormous damage to some of our buildings. Some of them are saying it
couldn't have been prevented.     Baloney!
 

Nobody with a .45 on his hip is going to allow some yahoos to cut his throat with a box cutter.
The stupid bureaucrats in both Clinton and Bush administrations refused to arm the
pilots -- -- and worst of all, are still dragging their feet in doing so, even after congress
passed a law. The pilot's union says only about 5% of pilots have been certified to pack
a sidearm.  The FAA put the "training" station a day's automobile drive from the
nearest airport and give an intensive questioning that some pilots fear a "wrong"
answer to could ruin their careers.  Yet, we give guns to street cops !!!
 

Back in the sane 1950s, a Northwest airlines flight took off from Seattle and a crazy passenger
forced his way into the pilot's compartment and attacked one of the pilots.
 

The other pilot took a pistol out of his flight bag and shot the guy - DEAD!
 

Most of the pilots now working for the airlines previously were in the USAF and flew many hours
with a pistol on their hip. Why in heaven's name should they not be allowed to do the same in
today's world where the potential for needing a side arm is much much more than it was in the USAF?
 

Some people say "Oh, they might go berserk and shoot up the plane". Well, if they are emotionally
stable enough to fly a $50 million dollar airplane loaded with passengers, they certainly are stable
enough to carry a gun.
 

Others say, "Oh, a gunshot could rupture the fuselage and cause a loss of cabin pressure". Folks
who say that do not realize that a commercial aircraft has many pressure leaks bigger than a .half
inch hole and have big compressors which put out enough air to cover. Moreover, would a slight
decompression be more disasterous than flying into a building???

Get Real folks!

One idiotic remedy that has been suggested is arming pilots with Stun Guns.

A stun gun works on high voltage electricity which temporarily paralyzes the recipient. Modern
aircraft are run mostly by computers. Computers work on very low voltage electricity. Firing a
stun gun in a plane would be infinitely more dangerous than shooting a pistol, because it could
very easily disable the aircraft's computers, and bring the plane down.

The real problem is an hysterical fear of guns instilled by the "Gun Ban Crowd".

 THIS HAPPENED IN NEW ORLEANS

 See GUNS and the MEDIA

 What do You think?

 return to index