Censored by Paul Gottlieb and the PDN

Letter to the editor submitted 10/15 - declined 10/19
The Boy Scouts vs the ACLU and Clallam United Way

The Boy Scouts of America have a long (95 years) and distinguished  history
of service to America.  Very many of our heros, and our leaders have been Scouts.
No organization has a better record of service to society and our youth.

"Honor", "Duty", "God" and "My country" are words from the Scout oath.
The ACLU and others who would destroy our traditions and reduce Americans
to the lowest common moral denominator hate those words. The ACLU is
constantly using  lawsuits and  threats to hamper the work of the BSA.

The sticking point is the BSA's prohibition of homosexual recruiting by scout
leaders.  The BSA does not go around peeking into bedrooms, so there are no
doubt,  homosexual scout masters doing a fine service.  But, the scouts are not
about sex, and do not allow a scout leader who announces, his sexual choice,
the only  reasonable motive being recruiting kids to a dead-end life style.

Many of the lawsuits they are filing are paid for by your tax dollars because
There is a provision in federal law that the government will pay for"civil rights"
lawsuits.  Seducing kids is a "civil right"?

Similarly,  "United Way" of Clallam County will no longer support the scouts.
According to Patty Hannah, U/W suggested the scouts use some material from
the Boys and Girls club and the scouts refused.  However, she also told me
some people give to U/W but direct their gifts to the scouts.  But, the catch to
that one is that the U/W deducts a handling fee before sending the money on
to the scouts.  The scouts are listed in the book under 'b'.  I send my donation
direct to them.  Why should the scouts money be used to support the U/W
when the U/W won't support the scouts???

See the book, The ACLU vs America, by Alan Sears and Craig Osten."



 SCOUT INFORMATION        MORE SCOUT INFORMATION            LEGAL

 See How the ACLU is Destroying America

 RETURN TO INDEX PAGE

TELL N.O.B.B what YOU think

The following letter to the editor was refused publication.  After I foolishly agreed to
some politically correct editing, an edited version appeared 9/15. Here is the orginal:


The price of gasoline is going up and since G. Bush was once in the oil business,
it must be his fault?

Ignore the fact that for five years he has been trying to get our moribund US Senate
to allow us to tap our own huge oil deposits in the Arctic.  However, a small majority
(Including MURRAY and CANTWELL) think the welfare of 2000 acres of Arctic desert
is more important thatn the welfare of the nation and the state  (Alaska crude is refined
here in Washington - that = jobs)  It is estimated that 2000 acres could produce enough
oil to replace the oil we buy from the Saudis, who use part of what we pay them to
finance terrorists to kill us and are prime movers in OPEC.

We can and should do more to develop alternative energy.  But, that takes time and
oil is a lot more than energy.  Do you ever use plastic?  It's made out of oil.  One could
hardly come up with a manufacturing process that doesn't use oil.

This country also has vast deposits of coal.  Most oil products (including gasoline) can
be made from coal.  Only, the groups who call themselves "environmentalists" oppose
the mining of coal.  Then, there is electricity generated from a totally clean, renewable
source:  WATERPOWER.  But, those same folks will not allow more dams to be built
and are working to tear down ones already in use.

Until we end the "dictatorship of the environmentalists", our downhill slide will continue.

s/Marv Chastain


Gottlieb has his own "estimated production" - a six month's supply.  The "six month's supply"
figure is one touted by enviros to prove it wasn't worthwhile  - - - But, that figure is six month
of total US oil usage.  Since we buy only about 14% of our oil from the Saudis, that would
represent 3-1/2 years replacement of Saudi oil.   However, until drilling or at least on-site
surveys by physicists take place, nobody has more than a vague idea how much oil is there.

The site sits right between two major oil fields  -  North Slope (US) and a major Canadian
oil field.  It's in the middle of an Arctic desert about 2/3rds the size of Washington State, known
as the Arctic National Wildfife Refuge (ANWAR). [not much wildlife can survie there]  By
directional drilling, the oil companies would only use about 2000 acres of this huge expanse.

Maybe the high price of gasoline will prompt some sensible actions in the Senate????

The enviros claim drilling would endanger the Caribou.  They made the same claim when
they opposed North Slope drilling.  Since then, the Caribou population has expanded
(at least trippling).  So much for enviros alarmism.

 RETURN TO INDEX PAGE

 Tell N.O.B.B. what YOU think