The Wildlands Plan
About a dozen years ago, two men, Dave Foreman and Reed Noss conceived a plan whereby, the US would
become a huge animal sanctuary with humans restricted to "islands" within the sanctuary where they would
be allowed to exist while the animals took over half of the country.  At the time this plan {The Wild Lands Plan]
was first published, most people looked at it and laughed - - or just put it down as the imaginings of a handful
of crackpots.

However, if you still laugh, you just aren't comprehending what is going on.  Because it is being implemented
by your federal government along with a powerful group of "environmenatists".  (I put the term in quotes
because many of the programs they are pushing are actually very harmful to the environment) - - It is a religious
program - - not a social or scientific one , though it masquerades as such.

         "We live for the day when grizzlies in Chihuahua have an unbroken connection to grizzlies in Alaska,
          when gray wolf populations are continuous from New Mexico to Greenland"

         "This is a bold attempt to grope our way back to October 1492, and find a different trail, a Trail grown
          and nearly forgtotten"

         "Our goal is to create a new political reality based on the needs of other species"

So says Foreman.  Foreman is now a board member of the Sierra Club.  Noss is a professor at Oregon State, but
more importantly he is the policy guru of the Defenders of Wildlife. The head of that organization is an old
college buddy and political ally of Norm Dicks.  Norm Dicks has stated he wants wolves in the ONP so he can
go up there and howl with them.

In order to implement the plan these people are working to:
    1- Encourage people to move out of rural areas and into the city.

    2- Have government and/or NGOs buy up or take the land.

    3- Stop all industrial activity, farming, logging, Dams, etc. in rural areas.

    4. Destroy roads, dams, power lines, etc.

So, it involves destruction of any  infrastructure that it outside the cities.
It involves getting government to purchase and/or seize land any way they
can and for any reason anyone can come up with and/or getting NGOs
(Non government organizations - such as the Sierra Club)  to manage it.

This project was a big part of the Clinton/Gore administration.  It was pushed
heavily by Bruce Babbitt and would have been pushed by Kerry or Gore if they
had won the election - and that is a big part of the hatred that is being vented
on Bush for defeating them.

So, now that they have been defeated, are we safe from the political aspect ?
Not at all.

What Clinton and Gore did accomplish was to load government agencies,
particularly the Interior department with  Wild Lands advocates.  Most of them are
protected by civil service and can't be fired in any practical manner.   Bush has
been rather timid about getting rid of the higher echelon who can be fired.

And what are they doing.  They continue to promote wolves.  The wolf populations
in Wyoming, Montana and Idaho are growing by leaps and bounds (far faster then the
original estimates) and are decimating the deer and elk populations as well as domestic
cattle.

 

See Wolf Report

They have promoted increases in wolf and grizzly bear populations and have
resisted any move to take those critters off the endangered species list.  Reports
I get from Idaho and Montana say they are devastating cattle ranching.  And several
have gone to prison because they shot the creatues.  The feds put radio collars on
them, so if you kill one on your property, you can expect a visit from armed feds.

As the West was being settled,  it was clear that to raise cattle profitably, you had to
have a lot of land.  So the government set up a program where a rancher could buy
grazing rights on federal land.  These rights attached to the rancher's home property
and has he died or moved on, they went to the heir buyer - so, they are an essential
asset necessary for the ranch to continue to operate.  For a couple of decades, there
has been a  war going on between the forest service, the BLM and ranchers.  Some
federal judges are liberals and have denied the ranchers have any vested interest in
grazing rights.  There have also been some legal victories by ranchers.   But, the bottom
line is that the ranchers are up against the federals and that is a very tough fight.

A couple of years ago, they cut off irrigation water for farmers in the Klamath basin,
bankrupting many of them.  The excuse was sucker fish.  A useless fish that  people
have been trying to eliminate for a hundred years, which are now on the endangered
species list.

Where do we come in?

Now that they have farmers and ranchers on the run in Montana and Idaho
to the East of us, they are about to introduce wolves in Oregon - to the South
of us. The Oregon F&WS is all for it.  Who do you suppose will be next?

You guessed it - - Washington State.

And where in Washington State will they most likely start?  Since the
Olympic Peninsula is still pretty rural and is mostly owned by government,
where better to start than the Olympic Peninsula?

If you are a land owner, a hunter, involved in the wood products industry
or hope to leave your children with the option to own land or do either of
these things, then you need to get involved.

Tell NOBB what you think - or ask for more information

Return to Index Page